deeboguess anthropic forgot to tell the llm "make no mistakes or i kill myself"
dreamrealwe don't know that it made no mistakes
dreamrealthat's not really the point anyway
dreamrealthe port changed the surface language, it didn't change the flaws the port was supposed to address
dreamreal"We'll use Rust for memory safety!" ... okay, good idea. Doing that myself.
dreamreal"... but we're going to let the LLM use unsafe everywhere." ... then why are you using Rust? It's not an empty question OR an empty answer - you can migrate away from unsafe usage over time - but still, if that's the goal (the migration over time) say so, don't market it as "we used idiomatic rust" when you didn't
dreamrealand the observation about the test suites still stands, too: passing most of the test suite is great, glad it's there, but is it a good test suite?
BombeYeah, coverage (as in a percent value) is quite treacherous.
dreamrealI don't think it's a bad thing to consider
dreamrealI just feel like Bun is always going to feel like zig rewritten in rust, without being what it should be... but what it SHOULD be is probably going to end up being a lot like deno
cheeseryeah. most language ports like that don't tend to emit idiomatic code
wedrXDDDD I'm now going through "rewriting legacy projects" for the second time! Confirmed with my manager and the whole team.
Zapekdid the LLM rewrite the test suites too? :)
Tenchiit simply commented them out
dreamrealNo, it didn't (either one). The test suite was largely left alone; apparently there were some tests altered, but they were altered based on being incomplete or wrong