NeXeNgood thing about virtual threads, is that they just simply make blocking cheap
* fgarcia_ joined #java
* arthurvl joined #java
* acidjnk joined #java
* MikeBux joined #java
* johnjay joined #java
* yamada joined #java
* SJrX joined #java
* mrcrabs827769651 joined #java
* stfstfm joined #java
* nevet joined #java
* CodeGeek!~codegeek@about/java/CodeGeek changed the topic to: Welcome! || Read Channel Rules at https://javachannel.org/ before participating. || Paste limit is two lines; ~pastebin lists options. || No applets, please. || Minecraft, Android, and Javascript all have their own channel. || You are being logged.
* Betal joined #java
* GreenResponse joined #java
* ForeverDreaming joined #java
* sponkz joined #java
* hwpplayer1 joined #java
* Fiji joined #java
* Fiji_ joined #java
dreamrealthe best kind of improvement is *continual*, not *dramatic*. Dramatic's awesome, but hard to repeat, while you can ALWAYS make it a little bit better, one day at a time.
* EthanHunt joined #java
* metalmaniac joined #java
* phlox joined #java
* phlox joined #java
* Anaphaxeton joined #java
Drixtanyou could have a continual improvement, which includes dramatic improvements here and there... one doesn't remove the other.
* dob1 joined #java
dreamrealSure. Neither one precludes the other.
ernimrilbut many small improvements takes a lot of time, I want it all fixed with a lot of new features, possibly by yesterday! :-)
Parawhy do many small improvement when one big improvement do trick
ernimrilwell, I am trying to fix the different warnings lint tools tell me about my compiler codebase, and sometimes when I "fix" a small thing I have to implement the underlying feature... this is a mix of small and larger fixes
ernimrilpretty nice to have the compiler be able to compile itself since some time ago