ByteCode.News
Submit RSS Atom Sign in

Back to the channels

#java

  1. * Munnu joined #java
  2. * mindCrime joined #java
  3. * hwpplayer1 joined #java
  4. * five618480339176 joined #java
  5. * skum joined #java
  6. * MrHAPPY joined #java
  7. * OmniRadix6 joined #java
  8. * OmniRadix6 joined #java
  9. * OmniRadix6 joined #java
  10. * punit_arya joined #java
  11. * sponkz joined #java
  12. * sponkz joined #java
  13. * fgarcia joined #java
  14. * leppard joined #java
  15. * ferdna joined #java
  16. * Ragnor joined #java
  17. * hwpplayer1 joined #java
  18. * pr070cal joined #java
  19. * MikeBux joined #java
  20. * sponkz joined #java
  21. * hwpplayer1 joined #java
  22. * sponkz joined #java
  23. * yaboishady2 joined #java
  24. * hwpplayer1 joined #java
  25. * yaboishady2 joined #java
  26. * yaboishady2 joined #java
  27. * metalmaniac joined #java
  28. * tomboy64 joined #java
  29. * MikeBux joined #java
  30. * magla joined #java
  31. * punit_arya joined #java
  32. * dob1 joined #java
  33. * punit_arya joined #java
  34. * Exa joined #java
  35. * MonsterAbyss joined #java
  36. * hwpplayer1 joined #java
  37. * sponkz joined #java
  38. dreamreal dang it, I need co-authors.
  39. * hwpplaye` joined #java
  40. * hwpplayer1 joined #java
  41. * ChaiTRex joined #java
  42. * GreenResponse joined #java
  43. * punit_arya joined #java
  44. * punit01 joined #java
  45. Para dreamreal: Co-authored-by: Claude
  46. dreamreal except that's not actually a valid co-author
  47. dreamreal the LLMs acan be very useful in a lot of ways but they're not human and pretending otherwise is dumb
  48. Para I jest. I've recently made my LLM agents emit those to commits, main identity still being myself.
  49. Para (I'm currently working on removing git access entirely from LLMs, needed it as stopgap solution)
  50. * mwnaylor joined #java
  51. * Pixi` joined #java
  52. * kcomhnall joined #java
  53. * MonsterAbyss joined #java
  54. * hwpplayer1 joined #java
  55. * jcirc joined #java
  56. * mindCrime joined #java
  57. * MonsterAbyss joined #java
  58. * sponkz joined #java
  59. * Odyss3us joined #java
  60. * Yakov joined #java
  61. Yakov how good/resource heavy java gui?
  62. ernimril about the same as any other gui
  63. Para Thanks to Electron the comparison goalpost took a trip to orbit so some could even consider it light at this point.
  64. Yakov if compare to Qt and C#?
  65. Para Qt is native (if you stay away from the HTML5 components) so it's impossible to beat, C# I have no idea at this point.
  66. dreamreal Yakov: I'm not sure what you're asking, and the nature of teh UI is entirely relevant
  67. ernimril Yakov, how much comparison can you do? do you have the exact same program implements in both? As I said, about the same
  68. Yakov thats big! thank you folks
  69. Para You can use Qt from Java as well but this goes to It Depends territory; what are you trying to achieve?
  70. Para ref. https://www.qtjambi.io/
  71. nevet Qtjambi Io [TLS certificate invalid]
  72. ernimril Yakov, I am one of a few here that have worked on big desktop apps for java, I have not seen any problem with it as such. Now, doing good UI is very hard, but it is the UI that is hard, not the platform you choose
  73. Yakov Jambi in Indonesia?
  74. Yakov well, I want to make my own gui, starting from drawing dots in assembly, but for current task I want to switch from qt to java for some reason, it looks fine from a first glance, but I suspect it might not max efficient in comparison to some unknown yet vendor
  75. dreamreal Yakov: "max efficiency" is a will-o-the-wisp
  76. Yakov hard to deploy, debug, resource heavy etc
  77. ernimril you do not want to draw pixels for a modern gui, you want hardware support... but sure go for vulcan if you want
  78. Para We're at "give datacenters all the drinking water" stage of max efficiency...
  79. dreamreal make it work well enough. Java's fine; plenty of people go "Java sucks for UI" while using IntelliJ for their IDE, completely forgetting that IDEA is written in 100% Java for the UI
  80. Para Is JavaFX vector based? Not that it really matters.
  81. Yakov Qt written with Java?
  82. dreamreal and Java can do images fine, too: you could write Minecraft in pure java now if you wanted to.
  83. Yakov I mean its IDE
  84. Yakov 23:50:36 <ernimril> you do not want to draw pixels for a modern gui, you want hardware support... but sure go for vulcan if you want
  85. Para JetBrains has their own LAFs they've built over time. It's still just Swing, I think?
  86. dreamreal Still just Swing.
  87. Yakov ^ i want to go deeper and do my own kind of vulcan
  88. dreamreal Yakov: java can render pixels in the UI, you'd draw on a panel and let java render it
  89. ernimril swing, but with some patches
  90. dreamreal java2d is fine, so is javafx
  91. dreamreal but if you're trying to create your own tree/rendering pipeline, you may want to consider why
  92. * Betal joined #java
  93. * rvalue joined #java
  94. * mindCrime joined #java
  95. * monkeyPlus joined #java
  96. * sponkz joined #java
  97. * rvalue joined #java
  98. * ferdna joined #java
  99. * rorx joined #java
  100. * rvalue joined #java
  101. * mindCrime joined #java
  102. * Nemu64 joined #java
  103. * arthurvl joined #java
  104. * geli joined #java
  105. * gaxar joined #java
  106. * jcirc joined #java
  107. * lord4163 joined #java
  108. * monkeyPlus joined #java
  109. * fgarcia joined #java
  110. * fgarcia joined #java
  111. * fgarcia joined #java
  112. NeXeN Para: ya ...uh yeah it is
  113. NeXeN Para: but you might be confusing "vector based" with pixel pushing
  114. NeXeN javafx uses uh whats it called like retained scene graph or whatever
  115. NeXeN they're mathematically defined by their geometry not by pixel like pixel pushers
  116. NeXeN or sorry didn't mean to imply you were confused, what i meant to say is most people assume that about javafx's canvas
  117. * ernimril joined #java
  118. * leppard|2 joined #java