ByteCode.News
Submit RSS Atom Sign in

Back to the channels

#nevet

  1. * nevet joined #nevet
  2. * dreamreal!~dreamreal@about/java/dreamreal changed the topic to: This is the channel for the development of the software that runs nevet: https://github.com/jottinger/bytecode.news
  3. bot [jottinger/bytecode.news] New PR #175: fix/jvm news references 174 - https://github.com/jottinger/bytecode.news/pull/175
  4. * NeXeN joined #nevet
  5. dreamreal https://bytecode.news/
  6. nevet Nevet - Reference UI
  7. dreamreal Hmm, the reference UI is kinda brittle, I think. :/
  8. * blue joined #nevet
  9. dreamreal yo blue
  10. dreamreal good shabbos
  11. blue hi dreamreal, good shabbos
  12. dreamreal bytecode.news is up
  13. dreamreal not well
  14. dreamreal but up
  15. blue I see
  16. dreamreal I, uh, am happy it's working fsvo "working" but.. yeah, it's labeled a reference UI and that's pretty accurate :D
  17. blue great
  18. Chronos dreamreal: Is email-based sign-in up and running?
  19. dreamreal should be, I'm using it
  20. dreamreal check spam
  21. dreamreal if you NEED I can give you the code
  22. Chronos Ah, yep. It was in Spam. Thanks.
  23. * dreamreal flexes with direct DB access
  24. Chronos My "report not spam" on Google should help.
  25. dreamreal yeah, unfortunately there was a wordpress site on my server that, uh, had open registrations
  26. dreamreal so my mailq tended to be >800 full.
  27. dreamreal has been fixed.
  28. dreamreal So how's it responding? The site blows, IMO, for various reasons, but should be *functional*
  29. Chronos It seems far more responsive than most websites so far.
  30. dreamreal it's SPA. It has an initialization condition that hurts it, and it's not especially SEO friendly
  31. Chronos Ah. Even on initial load, it seemed pretty close to instant to me.
  32. Chronos dreamreal: Does the website require reauthentication when it's closed and reopened?
  33. Chronos Ah, never mind.
  34. Chronos "We use browser local storage (not cookies) to store your authentication token after login. This keeps you signed in between page loads. The token expires after 24 hours and is cleared when you log out."
  35. Chronos Already answered. :)
  36. * dreamreal nods
  37. dreamreal the communication's really light: the key is https://api.bytecode.news/features
  38. dreamreal that turns on and off various sections on the SPA
  39. Chronos The Knowledge Base page has a spinner that appears to spin forever
  40. dreamreal yes, that keeps showing up and I hate UI development
  41. dreamreal I hate that spinner so much
  42. dreamreal it's mostly related to the editor, I think
  43. dreamreal I don't know vite - that UI is vibe coded a LOT
  44. dreamreal the MVP was "hit as much of the rest services as we need to to make this all work" and it is indeed an MVP - the karma thing still needs to be done but karma boards are just like the knowledge base in terms of complexity, there's no "there" there
  45. Chronos No RSS Feed page yet, though I assume that's intentional
  46. dreamreal I found a *few* things in the backend services that needed to change, because of the UI requirements, but overall the delta was pretty small
  47. dreamreal it is not intentional, I have a plan for enabling it (everything's built, just not wired)
  48. Chronos I also assume Search is not all hooked up yet
  49. dreamreal I got this thing online by hurling it over the finish line late last night
  50. dreamreal Why would search not be hooked up?
  51. Chronos Ah, hmmm. Haven't gotten it to successfully find anything yet
  52. dreamreal the only thing that isn't real on that sidebar is the karma
  53. Chronos Oh wait, I see
  54. Chronos Never mind, I misunderstood search
  55. Chronos I was thinking it searched factoids too, whereas it searches blog posts.
  56. Chronos Although I was surprised to see "dreamreal" turn up nothing ;)
  57. dreamreal oh, it's not searching author, I guess
  58. dreamreal file a bug!
  59. Chronos Oh no, Comments has the eternal spinner too, heh
  60. dreamreal that's the editor
  61. dreamreal grrr
  62. Chronos oops, 404 when attempting to change my display name to Chronos
  63. Chronos Here's a screenshot https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/LpDJqcAw/image.png
  64. dreamreal file a bug, please
  65. dreamreal that should work (I've done it) and if it's not working, something broke
  66. dreamreal see, now it's blocking for me too :D I'm already planning out a revision of the UI, the reference UI needs to exist but I want something good
  67. Chronos will do
  68. Chronos dreamreal: Do you want an issue for the infinite spinners too?
  69. dreamreal Sure, but I know it's there already and it's UI shit and I have now done more UI than I have done in the last decade
  70. Chronos Err, I bet I just created this issue on the wrong thing...
  71. Chronos I created it for jottinger/bytecode.news — hopefully that was the correct place?
  72. dreamreal no, it's there
  73. dreamreal see /topic, that's right
  74. dreamreal you did it good
  75. dreamreal ~ Chronos ++
  76. nevet ~ Chronos now has karma of 1.
  77. dreamreal grr
  78. dreamreal Chronos: ++
  79. nevet Chronos now has karma of 4.
  80. dreamreal I *really* want nevet to be so kick-ass that javabot gets kicked to teh curb and I get ~ back
  81. dreamreal It won't happen because javabot's a playground for cheeser and he uses it to push morphia, sofia, and a few other tools forward
  82. dreamreal I made a decision a while back that I wasn't going to contribute more to javabot :/
  83. blue cheeser is a tard
  84. blue libtard prolly, too
  85. dreamreal nothing about the technology but I think the design is limited and unfixable in its scope, and then there's the occasional flareups with cheeser
  86. dreamreal blue: chill, chronos and I have known cheeser for a long long time
  87. blue then just say you don't like cheeser
  88. dreamreal and I know him IRL
  89. dreamreal I do like cheeser
  90. blue I don't
  91. dreamreal that's fine, you don't know him
  92. dreamreal nobody's asking you to like him
  93. blue the one time I went into java he bullied me, so he can go to hell and burn there
  94. dreamreal yeah, definitely a reason to condemn someone
  95. dreamreal the world is full of condemned people, that's how it goes
  96. blue the world is also full of bullies
  97. dreamreal sure, it's like tikkun olam has a purpose
  98. blue this guy is beyond that
  99. dreamreal he has concerns that you do not know about
  100. blue his concerns do not interest me, and give him no reason to be bully
  101. dreamreal I'm sure. But at the same time, YOUR conflict with him does not interest ME, and gives you no reason to bully him even in absentia. :D
  102. blue good, I'll shut up
  103. dreamreal did you see that HWFO diatribe I wrote? :D
  104. dreamreal that whole conversation was AMAZING, and I kept thinking "oh thank god blue is not here"
  105. blue no? where? I don't visit HFWO anymore
  106. blue HWFO*
  107. dreamreal discord
  108. dreamreal I actually warned BJ about the thread - the discussion had a lot of the things he actually worries about
  109. blue dude
  110. blue I need to maintain a list of morons
  111. blue and do you know who would come out on the VERY top
  112. dreamreal why? Have a list of non-morons, it'll be far shorter
  113. blue even BEFORE cheeser?
  114. dreamreal biden? talarico?
  115. blue BJ
  116. dreamreal harris? clinton?
  117. dreamreal hah
  118. * dreamreal slaps blue on a list of morons
  119. blue BJ is EXACTLY what this wall of text you sent me talks about
  120. blue the idea that if america were just isolationist and never dip its hand in the friggin gooplake, all would be good
  121. dreamreal BJ is a man without a home, is the problem
  122. blue in what universe is that my problem
  123. dreamreal and he sees it, and worries, and can't see past the fact that he's without a home
  124. dreamreal it's not, until you make it your problem
  125. blue I'd say he's eaten what he's cooked
  126. dreamreal everyone does!
  127. blue good for him
  128. dreamreal so do I, so do you!
  129. blue yeah well I never claimed moral ambiguity, that I can tell you
  130. blue I never said, maybe we won't bomb iran because there's one good man there
  131. blue that's the story, isn't it?
  132. dreamreal I don't know what you actually think about the situation
  133. dreamreal I'm anti-war on principle but not pacifistic to no end: if you have a bad dog, it doesn't matter if it's your neighbor's dog and hasn't attacked your kids, you do something about it
  134. blue it doesn't really matter as long as I have a position
  135. blue that's the problem, the libertarians are actually worse than the wokelibs
  136. dreamreal well, a lot of those people have positions too: it's "what costs me less in the short term" and I find that ineffective and said so
  137. blue not having a position is the worst of all worlds
  138. blue it's this pure nihilism as escpoused by BJ and his folk that puts him on the block for me
  139. blue espoused*
  140. blue that's why I left HWFO
  141. blue "ya I'll throw you both out of my house"
  142. dreamreal I get that: like I said, the whole discussion is "interesting" with some fascinating emergence. (Steigman started it!)
  143. blue welp, it's great he doesn't HAVE a house to throw people out of now, how's that for a spinning for you, BJ
  144. dreamreal by "house" here I mean a place where he belongs, not an actual house, for the record
  145. dreamreal I'm just as unhomed but I know where I should belong, I think
  146. blue yes I know, and the point still holds, perhaps all the more so
  147. blue he doesn't have a house to throw me out of, because he has no values
  148. dreamreal Oh, sure he does: and he might, because of the fact that you're committed to your values! (Or he might not: Steigman is committed, too.)
  149. blue he 'values' boil down to "I don't wanna deal with actual contending matters of life"
  150. blue his*
  151. dreamreal I disagree: his scope is just far narrower than it should be
  152. blue he's a total copout; and that makes him worse than cheezer the wokelib, who might have values, even if they're deranged
  153. blue what's his scope? "my kids"?
  154. dreamreal okay, chill, for one thing
  155. blue that's a terrible scope
  156. dreamreal for another, cheeser's values are actually a lot less concrete than BJ's are
  157. blue I'm perfectly chill
  158. dreamreal then remember that these people are still my friends
  159. blue do you expect me to cut your friends slack because they are your friends? you know this is not how we roll, that's why timon's timon
  160. dreamreal I think you should show some freaking respect, sure
  161. dreamreal I don't care if you still disregard them: the disdain is actually philosophically really interesting, because of why
  162. blue respect is earned, and none of those I talked about he earned any respect, in my interactions with them
  163. blue has earned*
  164. dreamreal Sure, but I'm asking you to respect ME. If you choose not to, that's fine... but there it is, innit
  165. blue I'm *NOT* gonna transitivise YOUR respect for them, if that's your expectation
  166. dreamreal Did I say that? I did not. Disregard them. Feel what you feel. Think what you think.
  167. dreamreal I mean, in a lot of ways, you're mapping to the pardes: BJ is acher, cheeser would be... ben zoma?
  168. blue mhm
  169. dreamreal it's kinda sad: four went in, one came out... and in the real world, it'd be more like 99,999 went in, and one came out. Lots of achers, ben zomas, ben azzais. I know which one I think *I* map to.
  170. blue shammai
  171. blue you're WAY too nice for this world
  172. blue almost to a fault
  173. dreamreal ME? Huh. Shammai was the mean one! Hillel was the nice one.
  174. blue certain to a fault
  175. blue did I say shammai? I meant hillel, obviously
  176. dreamreal I was wondering!
  177. blue well, you certainly fit the "speak less and do more"...
  178. dreamreal I think it's more along the lines of "I forgive much, because that's a good impulse and it helps the world turn more easily for everyone," maybe with a distant hope that others will go "hey, that seems to keep him fairly regulated, maybe I should try that sometime"
  179. blue ya well, I almost never forgive at all, particularly when I'm offended, which happens never
  180. blue mostly because you can't offend me, only mine
  181. dreamreal Well, when I'm ACTUALLY offended I can hold on to anger like a dog with its last bone. But I haven't gotten truly angry in years. Irritated, sure - that post on discord is a FINE example of me taking off the gloves.
  182. blue it does NOT read as a HFWO convo though, I was sure that bounded off that xeet
  183. dreamreal Chronos: if you want to see what I'm talking about, BTW, I can send to you in email if you like
  184. blue bounced*
  185. dreamreal oh, it definitely was, but there were lots of confused people in the conversation, all desperate to avoid justification for iran
  186. dreamreal the core thing was "I don't like it" salted liberally with "It's not REALLY my problem" and "I don't know how it'll end, so it shouldn't have started" with an occasional spice of "the jews did it"
  187. dreamreal Sawa got mad at me for saying "we" when referring to the joint operation. "Who's WE? You israeli?"
  188. dreamreal (not a quote, but even so.)
  189. blue there's a certain wing of the maga movement that is just as terrible as the wokeleft. they hate jews, and their 'concerns' seems to be wholly contained within the lines of american soil
  190. blue onto which wing I most wholeheartedly include BJ and his rotten ilk
  191. blue steigman is just a useful idiot
  192. blue probably a kapo in another universe
  193. blue like, 99.99%
  194. dreamreal that low?
  195. dreamreal I keep dropping authentic judaism in that thread like I'm introducing it to goyim at shul - "So, Jonathan, here's what Judaism is about" because I can't resist poking at him.
  196. blue did you ask him if his KKK application went through already?
  197. dreamreal no, he'd never join the KKK, too white
  198. dreamreal all those WHITE sheets? How racist can you be?
  199. blue he's a democrat, they started the KKK :P
  200. dreamreal You do know *I* almost joined the KKK, though, right?
  201. blue maybe you soul-switched with steigman for a while
  202. dreamreal Unlikely :D
  203. blue heck, steigman is so bad he almost makes *me* an antisemite
  204. dreamreal Eh, he's just a purely performative Jew, using his Jewish roots as a way to flagellate himself
  205. blue yes, that's the point, thank you for literally repeating it
  206. dreamreal I like repeating points, and being thanked for repeating them even with more effective framing is a dopamine SHOT
  207. blue you do realise you're making my points much less subtle, right
  208. dreamreal Sure, I'm reframing them for myself
  209. blue ya
  210. dreamreal I think I'm gonna capture that whole exchange for posterity
  211. dreamreal It's AMAZING, dude
  212. dreamreal it reads like sophistry but it's pilpul
  213. blue on HWFO?
  214. dreamreal yeah
  215. blue I often calls the AI 'm8', and it loves it for some reason
  216. bot [jottinger/bytecode.news] New issue #177: Fix robots.txt scheme behind reverse proxy - https://github.com/jottinger/bytecode.news/issues/177
  217. bot [jottinger/bytecode.news] New issue #176: Edit Display Name results in: Error (404) An unexpected error occurred. - https://github.com/jottinger/bytecode.news/issues/176
  218. dreamreal oh, now that the backend is online I can enable the webhooks!
  219. Chronos Who is BJ?
  220. Chronos dreamreal: Sure, please send an email, I'm curious
  221. dreamreal He's the guy who runs a slack
  222. dreamreal Sorry for formatting
  223. dreamreal Some of the players: Steigman is an idiot, a Jew who never saw a pro-Jewish position he wouldn't advocate against
  224. Chronos "We are witnessing history. Iran, to everyone's surprise, is destroying American bases so thoroughly, on such a large scale, and so decisively that the world is not ready for this." — Is this true? Iran is destroying American bases so thoroughly and effectively?
  225. Chronos (I've been largely staying under my rock purposefully.)
  226. dreamreal They're destroying american bases so thoroughly that we've seen a rather drastic 0% decrease in effectiveness. Maybe even 0.0001%!
  227. dreamreal The person who tweeted, BTW, had a russian flag in their bio
  228. dreamreal I think he's right: the world was not ready for Israel and America to BOTH be cruising over Iran as if there was no resistance whatsoever. We dismantled first-line russian and chinese defenses in ... I mean... 20 minutes?
  229. dreamreal I mean, mein Gott. We have B-52s flying over Tehran. B-52s! Their formal name is the "Buffalo" - but the informal name is "easy target." You don't fly those over an enemy unless you've left air *supremacy* behind in the dust.
  230. dreamreal Sorry, BUFF - Big Ugly Fat Fellow. :D
  231. dreamreal So, to answer you directly: it's VERY untrue in the sense that the author meant it. It's surprising, yes, in that we expected it to be a LOT harder. Instead it's involved effort that LOOKS LIKE a white-hot knife through particularly warm butter. It's not that way - both Israel and America are being careful and determined - but the effect is the same.
  232. Chronos dreamreal: You think reports of U.S. bases being thoroughly destroyed is mostly propaganda?
  233. dreamreal And no, Iran has scored a few hits - there are dead on our side - but those hits have been performative.
  234. dreamreal Uh... with all due respect, I can guarandamtee it
  235. dreamreal My day job is in signals analysis
  236. dreamreal it's really really hard to hide something like that
  237. dreamreal and that's not something that requires "insider knowledge" which I do not have anyway
  238. blue Chronos: persians are known liars
  239. dreamreal IRGC, not persians: I know a few iranians
  240. blue same thing atm
  241. Chronos dreamreal: Signals analysis! Interesting.
  242. dreamreal Not really
  243. Chronos blue: Hmmm.
  244. * blue calls out on dreamreal for pilpul
  245. dreamreal No, the IRGC is a 130k large cadre in control in Iran: they act AS IRAN. I know at least four iranians who hate the IRGC with white-hot passion... as muslims.
  246. blue welp, time to rise up, it's now or never
  247. blue ah wait, not happening...
  248. dreamreal Agreed, although they're HERE, not THERE
  249. blue guess they're fine with the IRGC
  250. blue oh, you mean EXPATS
  251. blue well
  252. blue that doesn't count
  253. dreamreal Oh, bullshit
  254. Chronos dreamreal: Do you think Iran can successfully bankrupt the U.S.? For example, send in a lot of cheap drones, that require expensive countermeasures.
  255. dreamreal That's like saying "you can't say 'we Jews' unless you're in Israel, you coward, you fled" - that's not how anything works. They left and fled BECAUSE they matter.
  256. dreamreal Chronos: no.
  257. blue dreamreal: yes; though the point is 'we Israelis'. when I talk about Israelis, I mean Israelis IN ISRAEL, not expats
  258. dreamreal blue: I get it, but your characterization was broad and I take exception to it.
  259. blue broad characterisations UNDERPIN reality
  260. dreamreal Chronos: there's a lot of fearmongering. It's ridiculous. Iran is *flailing*. Flailing is effective in part because it's unpredictable... which means the results are naturally self-limiting as well. In terms of pounds-to-pressure, Iran is worse than a paper tiger at this point.
  261. blue currently, as long as iranians aren't toppling this terrorist regime, they're SUPPORTING it. that's how it is. I'm not calling them cowards or evil per se, but they ARE supporting it
  262. blue that's just factual
  263. dreamreal And they've also ALREADY severed their command structure, which means their CEILING is a set of messy warlords all fighting amongst themselves, with a *titular* head somewhere... and we keep hitting the head *and* the warlords
  264. dreamreal blue: I hear you. They need to be enabled and act on it.
  265. blue this applies everywhere, btw. gazans... are the BEST example.
  266. blue are they all terrorists? no. do most of them support/are fine with hamas? YES. 10000000% YES.
  267. dreamreal Yeah, the gazans are... going to be difficult to uncorrupt. It's not about getting them on "our side," as much as it is "We really want them to value seeing their kids grow up."
  268. blue please note that even in PUBLIC polls, even after over TWO years of war, there is still an ABSOLUTE majority supporting them, and a SIZABLE majority thinking 7/10 was GREAT
  269. dreamreal Aware. Wrote about it.
  270. blue you CANNOT undo this insanity, you gotta write it off as done&done, next generation, go the desert you old lot
  271. Chronos dreamreal: I really hope you're right!
  272. dreamreal Or demand that they show the next generation by example...
  273. Chronos blue: Is it feasible for the Iranian people to overthrow the Iranian government? Doesn't the Iranian government have a monopoly on weapons there?
  274. dreamreal Chronos: well, I don't know the future, but so far, the US/Israel effort has been generational in success rate - that doesn't mean something CANNOT go wrong, but their capabilities have NOT improved (so to speak: more like their capabilities were headshotted out of the gate and have gotten far far far worse every day) and their capability to recover sans air supremacy is... well.. let's just say I'm
  275. dreamreal not a betting man, but I'd bet heavily against it.
  276. dreamreal I'd be willing to bet the mortgage against it, actually.
  277. blue we are told that kin liability, or guilt by association, is WRONG. but is it really wrong? isn't it your job as a PEOPLE to root out those of you who are dragging you into the abyss? and if not, is it not YOUR fault as well for having FAILED to do that?
  278. blue what's the ACTUAL argument against guilt by association?
  279. dreamreal Chronos: they went from 100% capacity to about 3% on day one - in the first few hours. And it's gone down from there. China and Russia could both weigh in, I suppose... but that'd be a LOT of escalation from them *and* we've just shown what our actual platforms can do. In broad daylight. In other news, did you know night falls once a day?
  280. dreamreal And we went into Tehran *against* Russian and chinese defenses. It's a meme already: "If you have a chinese anti-stealth radar, you can immediately tell a stealth plane is in the arena because it blows up."
  281. blue Chronos: everything is feasible. Your real epithet is 'is it worth it'. Iran has over 90 million people. as dreamreal noted, the SUPERBADDIES are well under a million. in terms of action economy, this is totally doable, likely though at grave costs to the unarmed population
  282. blue it's time for them to take their fate into their own hands, regardless how brutal the regime is
  283. dreamreal Also worth noting: for better or for worse, apparently we ARE trying to get some involved locals to act, including material support
  284. dreamreal but yes
  285. Chronos blue: I feel like "help the people rise up" regime change wars have been tried before, and almost all (or perhaps entirely all) fail.
  286. Chronos In the Middle East, at least.
  287. blue Chronos: that *is* true, therefore trump demanding unconditional surrender is not a bad move. fixed Germany, fixed Japan
  288. dreamreal Chronos: you're echoing some of the discussion from that thread :D
  289. dreamreal but yes, there are paths, and they're gonna hurt the people who surrender
  290. dreamreal sucks to be them, they're the ones who made the choices
  291. blue Chronos: but consider this. this is currently the *worst* of all worlds re Iran. There can be no possible *worse* alternative. we're at the stage where even a civil war is better than what they have, which is a terrorist regime both inwards and outwards
  292. dreamreal "We're going to pick a fight with someone who we're sure won't have the will to fight back." Not a bad bet, given the past 50 years.
  293. blue if you understand we're in the worst of all worlds re Iran, you see how clear this war was necessary, & welcome
  294. dreamreal And yes, an Iran where they have to pick up the wreckage and rebuild an evil institution is still having to rebuild from parts rather than finishing a job
  295. blue and just to be clear; there ARE worse worlds than a civil war world, we have been shown that MANY a time in the past
  296. blue an American world that accepted and perpetuated slavery would have been much worse than the civil war world
  297. dreamreal Did you see where the IRGC said "if you oppose us we will shoot your children?"
  298. blue if DJT saw this and said, "this IS the worst of all worlds, we have an adversay who 1) says he wants to kill us and 2) is actively working towards that 3) kills anyone in his own ranks who doesn't want that, then you see how clearly this war flows from it
  299. dreamreal Well, to be fair, they said it yesterday or so, not before. So it's them trying desperately to hold on to control, not an additional assault.
  300. blue the beauty of a 'rock-bottom' world is that it paints a clear path forward, because you don't have to worry about hitting anything lower
  301. blue take Russia, for example. Why not attack them, are they not just as evil? Well, there is a worse world there; for example, one where they use nuclear weapons
  302. dreamreal all the more reason to not let Iran get nuclear weapons. And oddly enough, gutting Iran makes Russian attacks on Ukraine MUCH harder to prosecute, thanks to fuel and drones.
  303. blue so whilst the "Russia is decimating the Ukraine" is a TERRIBLE world, it's not the WORST of all
  304. dreamreal It's kinda funny, innit? The same people shrieking "help ukraine!!!!" say "noooo don't hit IRAN!" when hitting Iran actually helps ukraine more than almost anything else
  305. blue ya well, maybe they need to go to game theory 101
  306. blue or to college
  307. blue or to high school
  308. blue or to kindergarten
  309. blue anything would do at this stage
  310. dreamreal Nah, they're just looking at their bank accounts and who pushes a narrative they've accepted. And disputing that narrative might involve "thought" or "a conscience."
  311. blue I think the thing they don't get the most are iranian expats demonstrating FOR the war, with Israel/US flags
  312. blue it's really hard for them to process when ACTUAL people demonstrate for ACTUAL things that concern them PERSONALLY in the world, and aren't some larpers paid by NGOs
  313. dreamreal They can't escape it much: every time they gather to mourn Iran, with their septum piercings and pride flags, "it's so sad that a government that would shoot us all and hang us by our entrails and hate everything we value is being attacked!!!!!," actual Iranians gather and shout them down :D "Chickens for KFC," indeed.
  314. blue hah
  315. dreamreal And it's like KFC is saying "We want to be everywhere, including where all them chickens are, yum. But those chickens are haram, we'll kill them without a second thought, but they're useful *for now"
  316. dreamreal I'm trying to avoid disdain, but ... dang
  317. blue I think they forgot that just a mere few years ago, Iran's president claimed at the UN that Iran has no gay people
  318. blue but that's ok! it's all good because we can demonstrate for the poor gazans and feel good in our own bodies!
  319. blue we saved the world!
  320. blue now the gazans won't throw us from roofs anymore!
  321. dreamreal ... except they would. You know, I wonder what Greta's pronouns are.
  322. blue sock/puppet
  323. dreamreal blue: ++ hahah that's pretty good
  324. nevet blue now has karma of 3.
  325. dreamreal But you know, if she comes out as they/them or *gasp* turns out to be a lesbian or whatever, it'd be hilarious. We should DEFINITELY let the flotilla on through. :D
  326. blue she'll need to flee gaza and ask for asylum in... israel
  327. blue oh the irony, oh man, that's a perfect world
  328. dreamreal (actually, no: I'm sure they rather politically astute on the other side would see her as politically useful and protect her from what the rank and file would endure, and everyone would go "but they let THAT muppet survive, are they all that bad?")
  329. blue until the cycle repeats itself, arab infighting begins, and she becomes a sex slave ISIS-style
  330. dreamreal I actually kinda hope she's asexual, though. Yikes. Can you imagine her as a sexual being? She'd be conducting oral sex with her teeth, snarling the whole time about how unfair everything is.
  331. blue I can't imagine her being sexually attractive to other humans
  332. dreamreal I haven't tried and don't want to.
  333. blue y'know, I think climate alarmism is stupid
  334. blue but I'd at least have had some respect for her if she STAYED IN HER DAMN LANE
  335. dreamreal diataxis
  336. nevet Diataxis is a way of thinking about and doing documentation. It's a quadrant of tutorials/explanation, how-to vs reference. What to write, how, and how to organize it. Should guide all documentation. Doesn't. URL: https://diataxis.fr/ Tag: documentation
  337. dreamreal article Diataxis
  338. nevet Idea session started: "Diataxis". Use 'content <text>' to add body paragraphs, 'done' to save, or 'cancel' to discard.
  339. dreamreal content Diataxis (https://diataxis.fr) is a way of thinking about and doing documentation. It establishes four needs, and four forms of documentation: tutorials, how-to guides, technical reference, and explanation.
  340. nevet Content block #1 added to "Diataxis". Use 'content <text>' to add more, or 'done' to save.
  341. dreamreal content It solves problems related to content (what to write), style (how to write it), and architecture.
  342. nevet Content block #2 added to "Diataxis". Use 'content <text>' to add more, or 'done' to save.
  343. dreamreal content It should guide most documentation efforts - and the sad thing is, it doesn't.
  344. nevet Content block #3 added to "Diataxis". Use 'content <text>' to add more, or 'done' to save.
  345. dreamreal done
  346. nevet Idea saved as draft: "Diataxis" (3 content blocks).
  347. dreamreal ++
  348. dreamreal new feature, y'all! And with the site online, IT WORKS.
  349. dreamreal Ooo it failed though
  350. blue https://bytecode.news/factoids/diataxis
  351. nevet Nevet - Reference UI
  352. dreamreal the article's there but attribution was wrong
  353. blue ya really need to fix this ridiculous counter
  354. blue it goes up everytime I refresh
  355. dreamreal that's because you're accessing it
  356. blue that's a ridiculous metric, fix it
  357. dreamreal "why does the number of accesses go up every time I access it"
  358. blue oh man, who wrote this frontend
  359. dreamreal I know, it BLOWS
  360. dreamreal Do a gooder one, please
  361. dreamreal Okay, see the blog - I just published the diataxis thing :D
  362. * dreamreal has a frankenstein moment. IT'S WORKING! Not perfectly, at all, but it's STILL working!
  363. dreamreal That diataxis article was written RIGHT HERE in front of you based on a discussion in #java
  364. * dreamreal is ridiculously proud of this
  365. dreamreal diataxis.stats
  366. nevet diataxis has been accessed 12 times, last accessed at 2026-03-07T15:56:18.992662Z.
  367. dreamreal diataxis.stats
  368. nevet diataxis has been accessed 12 times, last accessed at 2026-03-07T15:56:18.992662Z.
  369. dreamreal :D
  370. bot [jottinger/bytecode.news] New issue #181: Support GitHub webhooks as alternative to polling - https://github.com/jottinger/bytecode.news/issues/181
  371. bot [jottinger/bytecode.news] New issue #180: Track post view counts (internal only) - https://github.com/jottinger/bytecode.news/issues/180
  372. bot [jottinger/bytecode.news] New issue #179: Reference UI: mute Edit Post link and add inline Publish for admins - https://github.com/jottinger/bytecode.news/issues/179
  373. bot [jottinger/bytecode.news] New issue #178: ArticleOperation creates posts as Anonymous instead of resolving IRC user - https://github.com/jottinger/bytecode.news/issues/178